Steven comments:
One of the reasons why so many nations have been willing to come out against us is because they had a perception that we would not retaliate. Thus there was little or no risk, but plenty of potential for gain. The cost-benefit analysis thus said that opposing the US was a good idea.Which is exactly correct. Opposing U.S. policy has always been a smart move politically, precisely because we are more moral than our enemies, and everyone from the most dim-witted street puppeteer to the most disgustingly craven French politician knows it. Think of it this way: opposing Americans means there is no need to fear bombs on the streets of Munich and Marseilles, and the Americans can still be counted on to rescue Europe if it guesses wrong. You could always score a few extra points with your loony anti-American Left by tossing out a few "fat, dumb, and happy" jokes: it would make you look clever and sophisticated (or perhaps even "brave," for mocking "the hyperpower"), and the Yanks would still be there the next morning, ready to pump money into your economy and protect you with their lives. No matter how venally self-serving your conduct, you could always paper it over by making a couple of grand speeches about how we are all "allies," and really, the U.S. needed the European bases in Europe to keep the Russians from heading west, which would have been almost as bad for us as it would have been for the French.
Thing is, that's no longer true. The Russians are not much of a threat these days; Islamic extremism and Arab fascism is what we are really concerned with. And neither Germany nor France seems to be willing to side with us in this conflict; in fact, they appear quite eager to cultivate closer relationships (and sell weapons) to the very thugs we consider dangerous. If anything, they seem to be doing a classic triangulation: playing both sides against each other, and trying to reap the rewards for being "neutral." The sweetheart deals TotalFinaElf has been concluding with Iraqi oil suppliers are only the most obvious example. So at some point, you have to ask, "Allies against whom? For what?"
But frankly, there is another angle to this that makes me hope the story is true. So far, we've been hearing from various corners of self-righteous stupidity how, for the U.S., This War Is All About Oil™, whereas the Gerjacques Chiroeder is "standing up to America" based on high principle. Terrific; let's see their adherence to principle in action -- surely it's worth a little damage to their economies, to keep the International Order™ intact? What's a little drop in the standard of living against Preserving the Integrity of the Global Community™, or some other such high-minded slogan? Better than selling out to l'hyper-puissance, non? Chirac, Schroeder, and (more importantly) their constituencies are thus faced with an actual, stark choice: their "noble" foreign policy principles, or their U.S.-subsidized standard of living? Just how willing are they to "stand up to the hyperpower" when the hyperpower is no longer feeling magnanimous? Just how much are their supposed principles worth to them, anyway?
Any idiot can march in the street when there aren't any consequences to fear, and millions of idiots did just that yesterday. (No, they were not all idiots, but judging from the photos, the posters, and the hodgepodge of causes, I'd say it was a pretty large percentage.) Let's see if the Germans and the French -- or, more importantly, the Weasels who lead them -- are willing to pay an actual price for what they profess at the microphone. If nothing else, it'll help us boost economies of nations more in need, and far more deserving.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(198)
-
▼
February
(59)
- Reading anything written by that most tenured of A...
- Peter Arnett, the CNN reporter of Gulf War I fame,...
- Random thought Are the French Nuclear Weasels?
- Smoove Blix is back at the UN "Iraq is being co...
- Where's Taranto when you need him? Top left cor...
- The Trib, whose site requires a free registration,...
- The Diablogger has an enlightening discussion with...
- I hate this man. With a passion. And after you...
- If you missed the Instapundit link, and still have...
- From Italy with love Paolo from Italy, a freque...
- A dictator on the move. A widely supported "peace...
- It seems like some "anti-war" lephtists are sponso...
- Jane Finch of The Daily Rant has left a couple of ...
- Eric the CR has some excellent thoughts on why peo...
- BBC reports that Palestinians are demanding gas ma...
- Paul Krugman has written another opinion piece on ...
- Tim Blair reacts to the protests pretty much as I ...
- Ralf Goegens of the Chicago Boyz (and Bill Quick's...
- By way of LGF comes word that the sophisticated wo...
- On David Frum's blog at National Review Online, th...
- By way of Israpundit (to which I have crossposted ...
- NATO has is now on board for planning the defense ...
- By way of Andrea Harris comes what could be a fit...
- Steven Den Beste has posted his reaction to an art...
- These four Israeli soldiers were killed Saturd...
- Alan has noticed that the North Koreans are taking...
- By now, you have probably heard or read the report...
- This condemnation of the anti-"war" idiots from an...
- A modest proposal Use all the hot air generated...
- Feel the love burning hate Seems that all is no...
- Don't go out on a limb here... The ever-skeptic...
- An editorial in the Detroit Free Press by Hady Amr...
- The pile of paperwork on Arafat's desk isn't getti...
- Aww... isn't that sweet Palestinian "refugees" ...
- Recall Hans Blix. Send our troops home. We are s...
- I am something of a casual science fiction fan. "...
- Despite the Guardian's best efforts to whitewash t...
- Sofia Sideshow says, let the "anti-war" nimrods sp...
- Stop, or the well gets it! Well, this is certai...
- Chocolate Poodle Watch Clearly not getting the ...
- Those of you hoping that the "anti-war progressive...
- In all honesty, I don't have any opinion on Paul K...
- Some of my favorite ads are the Real American Hero...
- The BBC reports that the British government is put...
- Alan's blog Avocare is but a week old, yet he alre...
- Those nasty Israelis -- they refuse to "fight fair...
- By way of junebug from the LGF comments section, c...
- The CounterRevolutionary points out that there is ...
- There is no fool like a persistent fool Seems t...
- Call off the deployment The Berkeley Pundits ha...
- I won't be doing much posting during the work day,...
- Someone please tell me why anyone would want to en...
- Thanks to BackBlog, comments are now up and runnin...
- Thanks to some good advice from Meryl Yourish, the...
- Service announcement I'm still working out the ...
- More thanks due: this time to Charles Johnson, who...
- What idiotarianism looks like Instapundit links...
- Woo-hoo! Got some linkage from Steven Den Beste! ...
- So a couple of days ago, the Sole Representative E...
-
▼
February
(59)
- Make Money Online
- Staunch Moderate
- Rittenhouse Review
- Work at Home News
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
- DipDot
- Second String Swap
- Investment Banking Monkey
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Bashhh
- TRR Blog
- Bloombox Reviews
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
0 comments:
Post a Comment