The plan won't work: you can't disarm an unwilling nation without taking it over, and any claim to the contrary is just a coffeehouse fantasy. Well, plenty of idiots out there engage in such fantasies, but surely the leaders of Germany and France aren't that clueless? There seems to be plenty of evidence that Iraq is working on a nuclear program, and if it's not stopped -- right now -- it may have nuclear weapons in a matter of months. At that point, the entire balance of power in the Middle East shifts towards Hussein, who will be able to take control of Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and most of the Middle East that is worthwhile. It's always been Hussein's dream (and the underlying philosophy of his Ba'ath party) that the Arab nation should be united. Nuclear weapons would allow Hussein to do just that, plus snag Iran as a "bonus," at which point he is free to build his Arab empire, using the revenue from the vast oil supplies he would control. The French and German governments know this, and they aren't stupid. Do they really want a new global power to emerge in the Middle East, with Saddam Hussein (or some other Ba'ath thug) at its head?
The most cynical part of me thinks they just might. During the Cold War between the U.S. and the USSR, countries like France and Germany were extremely significant, and could always demand reverence from the U.S., even though they were not as much allies as American client states. Triangulation is something that Europeans excel at, and another cold war -- this time between the U.S. and a nuclear-armed, Hussein-led pan-Araby -- could work quite nicely for them, especially given their warm relations with Arabs today, and the resentment towards America for its support for Israel. As a bonus, the Europeans might even get some preferences in terms of access to Middle Eastern oil, which would give them an advantage against the American economy, bringing the giant down another notch or two. And in the end, if Hussein gets too aggressive, America can always be counted on to come to their rescue again, and disarm him. Sure, it'll be far more bloody and expensive, but it's worth the risk -- and besides, it's not like they would do any actual fighting. After all, they are peaceful and sophisticated.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(198)
-
▼
February
(59)
- Reading anything written by that most tenured of A...
- Peter Arnett, the CNN reporter of Gulf War I fame,...
- Random thought Are the French Nuclear Weasels?
- Smoove Blix is back at the UN "Iraq is being co...
- Where's Taranto when you need him? Top left cor...
- The Trib, whose site requires a free registration,...
- The Diablogger has an enlightening discussion with...
- I hate this man. With a passion. And after you...
- If you missed the Instapundit link, and still have...
- From Italy with love Paolo from Italy, a freque...
- A dictator on the move. A widely supported "peace...
- It seems like some "anti-war" lephtists are sponso...
- Jane Finch of The Daily Rant has left a couple of ...
- Eric the CR has some excellent thoughts on why peo...
- BBC reports that Palestinians are demanding gas ma...
- Paul Krugman has written another opinion piece on ...
- Tim Blair reacts to the protests pretty much as I ...
- Ralf Goegens of the Chicago Boyz (and Bill Quick's...
- By way of LGF comes word that the sophisticated wo...
- On David Frum's blog at National Review Online, th...
- By way of Israpundit (to which I have crossposted ...
- NATO has is now on board for planning the defense ...
- By way of Andrea Harris comes what could be a fit...
- Steven Den Beste has posted his reaction to an art...
- These four Israeli soldiers were killed Saturd...
- Alan has noticed that the North Koreans are taking...
- By now, you have probably heard or read the report...
- This condemnation of the anti-"war" idiots from an...
- A modest proposal Use all the hot air generated...
- Feel the love burning hate Seems that all is no...
- Don't go out on a limb here... The ever-skeptic...
- An editorial in the Detroit Free Press by Hady Amr...
- The pile of paperwork on Arafat's desk isn't getti...
- Aww... isn't that sweet Palestinian "refugees" ...
- Recall Hans Blix. Send our troops home. We are s...
- I am something of a casual science fiction fan. "...
- Despite the Guardian's best efforts to whitewash t...
- Sofia Sideshow says, let the "anti-war" nimrods sp...
- Stop, or the well gets it! Well, this is certai...
- Chocolate Poodle Watch Clearly not getting the ...
- Those of you hoping that the "anti-war progressive...
- In all honesty, I don't have any opinion on Paul K...
- Some of my favorite ads are the Real American Hero...
- The BBC reports that the British government is put...
- Alan's blog Avocare is but a week old, yet he alre...
- Those nasty Israelis -- they refuse to "fight fair...
- By way of junebug from the LGF comments section, c...
- The CounterRevolutionary points out that there is ...
- There is no fool like a persistent fool Seems t...
- Call off the deployment The Berkeley Pundits ha...
- I won't be doing much posting during the work day,...
- Someone please tell me why anyone would want to en...
- Thanks to BackBlog, comments are now up and runnin...
- Thanks to some good advice from Meryl Yourish, the...
- Service announcement I'm still working out the ...
- More thanks due: this time to Charles Johnson, who...
- What idiotarianism looks like Instapundit links...
- Woo-hoo! Got some linkage from Steven Den Beste! ...
- So a couple of days ago, the Sole Representative E...
-
▼
February
(59)
- Make Money Online
- Staunch Moderate
- Rittenhouse Review
- Work at Home News
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
- DipDot
- Second String Swap
- Investment Banking Monkey
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Bashhh
- TRR Blog
- Bloombox Reviews
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
0 comments:
Post a Comment