Tuesday, February 11, 2003
8:06 AM | Posted by
E. Nough
By way of junebug from the LGF comments section, comes this pile of drivel from The Independent's Joan Smith:
It's about time the US got over 9/11Seriously. I mean, really, only some 3,000 people were murdered that day. Can't we just forget the whole thing? Why wasn't Ms. Smith around in 1943, telling us to get over this silly Pearl Harbor misunderstanding already?
If anyone had told me, in the autumn of 2001, that we were less than 18 months away from what might become the world's first nuclear war, I would have thought they were insane.She thinks we're on the brink of a nuclear war? That is insane.
In the half century since Hiroshima and Nagasaki...Ms. Smith, given that it's been a half century, isn't it time you got over Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
It is a measure of the paranoia afflicting parts of the US that officials deemed it necessary to announce, only hours after Columbia blew up in the sky over Texas, that a terrorist attack was not suspected. I know Saddam is a cunning old brute, but is it really likely that his agents have penetrated Nasa?While I rather doubt that terrorists had anything to do with the shuttle tragedy, why would it be so farfetched to think that saboteurs might have penetrated NASA, anyway? There are enemy spies and moles in just about every agency of every government. What is it about NASA that would make them impervious? And is it really so outlandish to think that a high-profile mission, full of symbolism and national pride, and carrying Americans, an Indian, and an Israeli might just be a very juicy target for terrorists? Of course not -- but hey, that shouldn't stop a worldly British columnist from mocking those Yankee roobs.
It is not that I don't take the threat of terrorism seriously. I am quite prepared to believe there are al-Qa'ida cells in European and American cities, but it is important to keep things in proportion. My guess is that most of us are more likely to be run over by a lorry than die in a terrorist attack, and I certainly do not want people in this country to reach the advanced state of paranoia reported in some American states.Oh, that is just bloody brilliant. You know that thing with ricin a few weeks back? Joan says don't worry about it. Just watch out for lorries. Remember, look right, then left, and leave the terrorist stuff to the constabulary. Joan will let you know when to be concerned.
The administration's war against the Taliban was neither a great military success (huge areas of Afghanistan are still in the hands of vicious warlords)...Why, I had no idea that the plan was to turn Afghanistan into the Sweden of Central Asia in 18 months! All this time I thought we merely wanted to destroy the al-Qaeda training and supply infrastructure, remove their Taliban supporters, and maybe make a dent against the Islamist idiocy that defined the whole country. How wrong I was! Destroyed terrorist camps, girls going to school, no more executions in city stadiums by lunatics out to Promote Virtue and Prevent Vice -- none of that counts for squat, since warlords still rule parts of the country that they've been in control of since the Russians left. Raise the white flag, corporal, and let's head home in shame.
...nor did it provide the kind of catharsis that millions of shocked Americans demanded after 11 September.See, that's what as us stunned roobs wanted: catharsis. Kids, this is what happens when you always look at the world through the eyes of your English Lit 101 TA. You get the feeling that ethos, pathos, and bathos were on deck, but Ms. Smith never got the chance to use them.
President Bush needs an enemy and Saddam fits the bill nicely, even though no one with an ounce of common sense credits Colin Powell's claims last week about an alliance between Iraq and al-Qa'ida.Wow. Wow. Joan Smith, counter-terrorism expert. Never mind the evidence laid out by Powell (who apparently lacks even an ounce of common sense): it's all bullshit, it has to be. I mean, we've read in both The Guardian and The Independent that Iraq had no connections whatsoever to al-Qaeda, so who does this Yank think he's fooling with his "evidence," anyway?
Powell did make a powerful case but it was for pressing on with weapons inspectionsSure, because when you demonstrate that inspections aren't working and never will, that means they should continue.
The Bush administration creates the impression that the US is still as wounded and ready to lash out as it was in the immediate aftermath of the collapse of the World Trade Centre.First, that's World Trade Center. I know writing these Americanisms is icky to sophisticated Britons, but really, it's a proper name, not subject to modification. We don't go around calling Tony Blair's party Labor, do we?
Second, arguing against straw men is fun and easy, but pointless. The attack on Iraq is not a "lashing out" against any ol' Arab we find handy. The Bush Administration views Iraq as a long-term threat, one completely separate from any al-Qaeda activity. Now, Ms. Smith doesn't have to agree with that, but she does have to recognize it, given that Bush, Powell, Rumsfeld, et al. have been talking about it specifically for the last several months.
I am not sure that this is true of the majority of Americans, but the country's moribund political structure and the Democrats' horror of appearing unpatriotic combine to make effective opposition very difficult.Translation: no one is buying my point of view. My point of view is clearly correct. Therefore, it must not have been presented well. Which has to be because dissent is "difficult."
The President may take comfort from the thought that Tony Blair's Gladstonian vision lends him some moral authority, but it does not wash over here.Now that is just plain arrogance: President Bush does not derive his authority -- moral or otherwise -- from Tony Blair or any other foreign source. Ms. Smith seems to be under the impression that America is still a British colony.
If the world has become a more dangerous place since 11 September 2001, it is not solely because of the activities of a bunch of Islamic terrorists.No, there's also the appeasers, accommodators, and useful idiots with newspaper columns.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(198)
-
▼
February
(59)
- Reading anything written by that most tenured of A...
- Peter Arnett, the CNN reporter of Gulf War I fame,...
- Random thought Are the French Nuclear Weasels?
- Smoove Blix is back at the UN "Iraq is being co...
- Where's Taranto when you need him? Top left cor...
- The Trib, whose site requires a free registration,...
- The Diablogger has an enlightening discussion with...
- I hate this man. With a passion. And after you...
- If you missed the Instapundit link, and still have...
- From Italy with love Paolo from Italy, a freque...
- A dictator on the move. A widely supported "peace...
- It seems like some "anti-war" lephtists are sponso...
- Jane Finch of The Daily Rant has left a couple of ...
- Eric the CR has some excellent thoughts on why peo...
- BBC reports that Palestinians are demanding gas ma...
- Paul Krugman has written another opinion piece on ...
- Tim Blair reacts to the protests pretty much as I ...
- Ralf Goegens of the Chicago Boyz (and Bill Quick's...
- By way of LGF comes word that the sophisticated wo...
- On David Frum's blog at National Review Online, th...
- By way of Israpundit (to which I have crossposted ...
- NATO has is now on board for planning the defense ...
- By way of Andrea Harris comes what could be a fit...
- Steven Den Beste has posted his reaction to an art...
- These four Israeli soldiers were killed Saturd...
- Alan has noticed that the North Koreans are taking...
- By now, you have probably heard or read the report...
- This condemnation of the anti-"war" idiots from an...
- A modest proposal Use all the hot air generated...
- Feel the love burning hate Seems that all is no...
- Don't go out on a limb here... The ever-skeptic...
- An editorial in the Detroit Free Press by Hady Amr...
- The pile of paperwork on Arafat's desk isn't getti...
- Aww... isn't that sweet Palestinian "refugees" ...
- Recall Hans Blix. Send our troops home. We are s...
- I am something of a casual science fiction fan. "...
- Despite the Guardian's best efforts to whitewash t...
- Sofia Sideshow says, let the "anti-war" nimrods sp...
- Stop, or the well gets it! Well, this is certai...
- Chocolate Poodle Watch Clearly not getting the ...
- Those of you hoping that the "anti-war progressive...
- In all honesty, I don't have any opinion on Paul K...
- Some of my favorite ads are the Real American Hero...
- The BBC reports that the British government is put...
- Alan's blog Avocare is but a week old, yet he alre...
- Those nasty Israelis -- they refuse to "fight fair...
- By way of junebug from the LGF comments section, c...
- The CounterRevolutionary points out that there is ...
- There is no fool like a persistent fool Seems t...
- Call off the deployment The Berkeley Pundits ha...
- I won't be doing much posting during the work day,...
- Someone please tell me why anyone would want to en...
- Thanks to BackBlog, comments are now up and runnin...
- Thanks to some good advice from Meryl Yourish, the...
- Service announcement I'm still working out the ...
- More thanks due: this time to Charles Johnson, who...
- What idiotarianism looks like Instapundit links...
- Woo-hoo! Got some linkage from Steven Den Beste! ...
- So a couple of days ago, the Sole Representative E...
-
▼
February
(59)
- Make Money Online
- Staunch Moderate
- Rittenhouse Review
- Work at Home News
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
- DipDot
- Second String Swap
- Investment Banking Monkey
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Bashhh
- TRR Blog
- Bloombox Reviews
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
0 comments:
Post a Comment