Wednesday, February 19, 2003
4:38 PM | Posted by
E. Nough
Eric the CR has some excellent thoughts on why people who are most oppressed are often not considered so by the "progressive forces" in the West:
One of the fundamental teachings of Marxism is that there is a direct relationship between oppression and revolutionary violence. The more oppressed or desperate a people are, the more likely they are to revolt. Once, this relationship was established in the popular mind, its converse has also become accepted. To wit, people who are oppressed revolt, people who are not revolting are not oppressed...This is partly true, though I can't help noticing that the "progressives" seem to get most exercised about the downtrodden when the United States or its perceived allies can be blamed for their plight. We thus get victimized Chileans, but benefitting Cubans, for example. The Tibetans seem to be a special case -- and even then, the U.S. is criticized for keeping up trade and diplomatic relations with the Chinese, far more than China for being a brutal colonial power that invaded and subjugated a weaker, non-threatening, and picturesque neighbor. (Oddly enough, most of the same voices demand that the U.S. reopen diplomatic relations and trade with Iraq. Well, no one ever accused them of being logical...)
Consider the difference between the plights of two Muslim peoples -- the Iraqis and Palestinians. The Iraqi people suffer under one of the most cruel dictatorships since the death of Stalin, while the Palestinians live with limited self-government and with welfare provided by a special UN agency. Yet, the Palestinians are considered the most oppressed by the prosperous West. Following this perverse logic, since the Palestinians have taken up arms in revolt and kill Israelis they must be oppressed. On the other hand, the Iraqis show nothing but “love” for their dictator. His pictures are everywhere and he won a recent election with 100 percent of the vote. Because the Iraqis are not revolting they're not oppressed and don't need our help.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(198)
-
▼
February
(59)
- Reading anything written by that most tenured of A...
- Peter Arnett, the CNN reporter of Gulf War I fame,...
- Random thought Are the French Nuclear Weasels?
- Smoove Blix is back at the UN "Iraq is being co...
- Where's Taranto when you need him? Top left cor...
- The Trib, whose site requires a free registration,...
- The Diablogger has an enlightening discussion with...
- I hate this man. With a passion. And after you...
- If you missed the Instapundit link, and still have...
- From Italy with love Paolo from Italy, a freque...
- A dictator on the move. A widely supported "peace...
- It seems like some "anti-war" lephtists are sponso...
- Jane Finch of The Daily Rant has left a couple of ...
- Eric the CR has some excellent thoughts on why peo...
- BBC reports that Palestinians are demanding gas ma...
- Paul Krugman has written another opinion piece on ...
- Tim Blair reacts to the protests pretty much as I ...
- Ralf Goegens of the Chicago Boyz (and Bill Quick's...
- By way of LGF comes word that the sophisticated wo...
- On David Frum's blog at National Review Online, th...
- By way of Israpundit (to which I have crossposted ...
- NATO has is now on board for planning the defense ...
- By way of Andrea Harris comes what could be a fit...
- Steven Den Beste has posted his reaction to an art...
- These four Israeli soldiers were killed Saturd...
- Alan has noticed that the North Koreans are taking...
- By now, you have probably heard or read the report...
- This condemnation of the anti-"war" idiots from an...
- A modest proposal Use all the hot air generated...
- Feel the love burning hate Seems that all is no...
- Don't go out on a limb here... The ever-skeptic...
- An editorial in the Detroit Free Press by Hady Amr...
- The pile of paperwork on Arafat's desk isn't getti...
- Aww... isn't that sweet Palestinian "refugees" ...
- Recall Hans Blix. Send our troops home. We are s...
- I am something of a casual science fiction fan. "...
- Despite the Guardian's best efforts to whitewash t...
- Sofia Sideshow says, let the "anti-war" nimrods sp...
- Stop, or the well gets it! Well, this is certai...
- Chocolate Poodle Watch Clearly not getting the ...
- Those of you hoping that the "anti-war progressive...
- In all honesty, I don't have any opinion on Paul K...
- Some of my favorite ads are the Real American Hero...
- The BBC reports that the British government is put...
- Alan's blog Avocare is but a week old, yet he alre...
- Those nasty Israelis -- they refuse to "fight fair...
- By way of junebug from the LGF comments section, c...
- The CounterRevolutionary points out that there is ...
- There is no fool like a persistent fool Seems t...
- Call off the deployment The Berkeley Pundits ha...
- I won't be doing much posting during the work day,...
- Someone please tell me why anyone would want to en...
- Thanks to BackBlog, comments are now up and runnin...
- Thanks to some good advice from Meryl Yourish, the...
- Service announcement I'm still working out the ...
- More thanks due: this time to Charles Johnson, who...
- What idiotarianism looks like Instapundit links...
- Woo-hoo! Got some linkage from Steven Den Beste! ...
- So a couple of days ago, the Sole Representative E...
-
▼
February
(59)
- Make Money Online
- Staunch Moderate
- Rittenhouse Review
- Work at Home News
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
- DipDot
- Second String Swap
- Investment Banking Monkey
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Bashhh
- TRR Blog
- Bloombox Reviews
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
0 comments:
Post a Comment