Before the usual suspects jump on the "Bush blew it!" bandwagon, let's get a few things straight from the beginning:
- Bush did not take office until
- By 2001, the WTC massacre was already planned and financed.
- Killing bin Laden would require firing into a sovereign nation without a declaration of war. That would be a violation of that precious International Law™, which must never, ever be violated, heaven forfend.
- There was disagreement over whether the man seen was actually bin Laden. It's not as if Afghanistan had a shortage of turbaned guys with beards, or Japanese trucks.
- Bin Laden was never convicted in any American court, much less an international court. No UN resolution was in place, authorizing his killing. This would have made his removal an unsanctioned unilateral American act of violence and an extrajudicial killing, both of which, of course, are very very bad because they delay
the coming of the messiahthe advent of World Peace™.
- Innocent people (innocent brown Muslim people!) would likely have died along with bin Laden -- also unacceptable under any circumstances.
- Al-Qaeda was more than just one millionaire. Bin Laden's death would certainly be damaging, but not a crippling blow to the network.
- If Bush had given the order, and the missiles were fired, and bin Laden was turned into small chunks; and if, in all likelihood, the WTC and Pentagon massacres were still carried out, how many of his current detractors would be out there yelling how we deserved it, how it was all our fault for killing al-Qaeda's "spiritual leader," how this was just an arrogant attempt at bullying by the Boy President who put us all in danger with his arrogant disregard for the feelings of humiliated Muslims and the complexities of international norms?
Update: Geoff Grasshoppa Meltzner fact-checked my [statements], and pointed out an obvious howler: Bush was inaugurated as President on January 20, 2001, as is customary. I meant to say that Bush's team wasn't fully in place until March 2001, but Bush himself was in the White House well before then. Apologies for the error; the rest of my point stands, though.
- ► 2004 (93)
- Couldn't have put it better myself: I don't kno...
- Cynthia Ozick makes an extremely distressing point...
- Re-cycle of violence Hey, where have we heard t...
- I have to ask... Sheep smugglers?! (As to th...
- AP has a story on the wires that the CIA may have ...
- A most interesting photo slide show by the AFP in ...
- Fans of Rachel "Squish" Corrie will no doubt be ou...
- Protesters bare meta-asses The usual bunch prot...
- I'm usually not very interested in loud arguments ...
- Another day, another bomb... The Arab-Israeli c...
- McDonald's vs. Lunch Ladies; no contest The eee...
- Two words: mashed peas.
- June's Atlantic Monthly has a fascinating article ...
- It doesn't suprise me that Mark Morford has penned...
- Wow, talk about credulous reporting: Teachers s...
- So much of this AP article on the Sultaana Freeman...
- ▼ June (16)
- Make Money Online
- Staunch Moderate
- Rittenhouse Review
- Work at Home News
- Second String Swap
- Investment Banking Monkey
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- TRR Blog
- Bloombox Reviews
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry